Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock: A randomized controlled trial.
Huang, Dabin; You, Chuming; Mai, Xiaowei; Li, Lin; Meng, Qiong; Liang, Zhenyu.
Afiliação
  • Huang D; Department of Pediatrics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, 466 Newport Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510317, Guangdong Province, China.
  • You C; Department of Pediatrics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Mai X; Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li L; Department of Pediatrics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, 466 Newport Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510317, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Meng Q; Department of Emergency, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liang Z; Department of Pediatrics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, 466 Newport Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510317, Guangdong Province, China.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(3): 1255-1263, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38095714
ABSTRACT
This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation improves the clinical outcomes of neonates with septic shock. Seventy-two patients were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation (LUGFR), or with usual fluid resuscitation (Control) in the first 6 h since the start of the sepsis treatment. The primary study outcome was 14-day mortality after randomization. Fourteen-day mortalities in the two groups were not significantly different (LUGFR group, 13.89%; control group, 16.67%; p = 0.76; hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI 0.27-2.50]). The LUGFR group experienced shorter length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays (21 vs. 26 days, p = 0.04) and hospital stays (32 vs. 39 days, p = 0.01), and less fluid was used in the first 6 h (77 vs. 106 mL/kg, p = 0.02). Further, our study found that ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation can significantly reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury (25% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.05) and intracranial hemorrhage (grades I-II) within 72 h (13.9% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.03). However, no significant difference was found in the resolution of shock within 1 h or 6 h, use of mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support, time to achieve lactate level < 2 mmol/L, and the number of participants developing hepatomegaly in the first 6 h.

CONCLUSION:

Lung ultrasound is a noninvasive and convenient tool for predicting fluid overload in neonatal septic shock. Fluid resuscitation guided by lung ultrasound can shorten the length of hospital and NICU stays, reduce the amount of fluid used in the first 6 h, and reduce the risk of acute kidney injury and intracranial hemorrhage. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital 2021-IIT-156-EK, date of registration November 13, 2021. And ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06144463 (retrospectively registered). WHAT IS KNOWN • Excessive fluid resuscitation in neonates with septic shock had worse outcomes. WHAT IS NEW • Lung ultrasound should be routinely used to guide fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Injúria Renal Aguda Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Injúria Renal Aguda Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article