Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shaheen, Nour; Shaheen, Ahmed; Elgendy, Abdelrahman; Bezchlibnyk, Yarema B; Zesiewicz, Theresa; Dalm, Brian; Jain, Jennifer; Green, Alexander L; Aziz, Tipu Z; Flouty, Oliver.
Afiliação
  • Shaheen N; Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Shaheen A; Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Elgendy A; Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Bezchlibnyk YB; Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
  • Zesiewicz T; Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
  • Dalm B; Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
  • Jain J; Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
  • Green AL; Oxford Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Aziz TZ; Oxford Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Flouty O; Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 17: 1297894, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098761
ABSTRACT

Background:

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promise in effectively treating chronic pain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DBS in this context.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, following the PRISMA guidelines. A well-constructed search strategy was utilized. Our literature search identified two groups of

subjects:

one group underwent DBS specifically for chronic pain treatment (DBS-P), while the second group received DBS for other indications (DBS-O), such as Parkinson's disease or dystonia, with pain perception investigated as a secondary outcome in this population. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.2.3 software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the tau^2 and I^2 indices, and Cochran's Q-test was conducted.

Results:

The analysis included 966 patients in 43 original research studies with chronic pain who underwent DBS (340 for DBS-P and 625 for DBS-O). Subgroup analysis revealed that DBS-P exhibited a significant effect on chronic pain relief, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.65 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [1.31; 2.00]. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, with an I^2 value of 85.8%. However, no significant difference was found between DBS-P and DBS-O subgroups. Subgroup analyses based on study design, age, pain diseases, and brain targets demonstrated varying levels of evidence for the effectiveness of DBS across different subgroups. Additionally, meta-regression analyses showed no significant relationship between age or pain duration and DBS effectiveness for chronic pain.

Conclusion:

These findings significantly contribute to the expanding body of knowledge regarding the utility of DBS in the management of chronic pain. The study underscores the importance of conducting further research to enhance treatment outcomes and elucidate patient-specific factors that are associated with treatment response. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=428442, identifier CRD42023428442.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article