Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Strikingly High Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Fractures Regardless of Surgery Timing.
Heckmann, Nathanael D; Yang, JaeWon; Ong, Kevin L; Lau, Edmund C; Fuller, Brian C; Bohl, Daniel D; Della Valle, Craig J.
Afiliação
  • Heckmann ND; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
  • Yang J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Ong KL; Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lau EC; Exponent Inc, Menlo Park, California.
  • Fuller BC; OrthoTexas, Carrollton, Texas.
  • Bohl DD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Della Valle CJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(6): 1557-1562.e2, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104784
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) often occur in the early postoperative period. Recent data has indicated that early revisions are associated with higher complication rates, particularly periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of timing of periprosthetic fracture surgery on complication rates. We hypothesized that complication rates would be significantly higher in revision surgeries performed within 3 months of the index THA.

METHODS:

The Medicare Part A claims database was queried from 2010 to 2017 to identify patients who underwent surgery for a periprosthetic fracture following primary THA. Patients were divided based on time between index and revision surgeries <1, 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 9, 9 to 12, and >12 months. Complication rates were compared between groups using multivariate analyses to adjust for demographics, comorbidities, and types of revision surgery.

RESULTS:

Of 492,340 THAs identified, 4,368 (0.9%) had a subsequent periprosthetic fracture requiring surgery 1,725 (39.4%) at <1 month, 693 (15.9%) at 1 to 2 months, 202 (4.6%) at 2 to 3 months, 250 (5.7%) at 3 to 6 months, 134 (3.1%) at 6 to 9 months, 85 (19.4%) at 9 to12 months, and 1,279 (29.3%) at >12 months. The risk of PJI was 11.0% in the <1 month group, 11.1% at 1 to 2 months, 7.9% at 2 to 3 months, 6.8% at 3 to 6 months, 8.2% at 6 to 9 months, 9.4% at 9 to 12 months, and 8.5% at >12 months (P = .12). Adjusting for confounding factors, risk of PJI following periprosthetic fracture surgery was similar regardless of timing (P > .05). Rates of subsequent dislocation and aseptic loosening were also similar regardless of timing.

CONCLUSIONS:

The risk of PJI following repeat surgery for a periprosthetic fracture was strikingly high regardless of timing (6.8 to 11.1%), underscoring the high-risk of complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article