Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex-disparities in chest pain workup: a retrospective cohort review of a university based clinical decision pathway.
Titus, Benjamin R; Ream, Karen S; Rehman, Tehreem; Allen, Larry A.
Afiliação
  • Titus BR; Internal Medicine Residency, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States. benjamin.titus@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Ream KS; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States.
  • Rehman T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, United States.
  • Allen LA; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 620, 2023 12 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114900
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Females have historically lower rates of cardiovascular testing when compared to males. Clinical decision pathways (CDP) that utilize standardized risk-stratification methods may balance this disparity. We sought to determine whether clinical decision pathways could minimize sex-based differences in the non-invasive workup of chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Moreover, we evaluated whether the HEART score would minimize sex-based differences in risk-stratification.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective cohort review of adult ED encounters for chest pain where CDP was employed. Primary outcome was any occurrence of non-invasive imaging (coronary CTA, stress imaging), invasive testing, intervention (PCI or CABG), or death. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We stratified HEART scores and primary/secondary outcomes by sex.

RESULTS:

A total of 1078 charts met criteria for review. Mean age at presentation was 59 years. Females represented 47% of the population. Low, intermediate, and high-risk patients as determined by the HEART score were 17%, 65%, and 18% of the population, respectively, without any significant differences between males and females. Non-invasive testing was similar between males and females when stratified by risk. Males categorized as high risk underwent more coronary angiogram (33% vs. 16%, p = 0.01) and PCI (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.04) than high risk females, but this was not seen in patients categorized as low or intermediate risk. Males experienced more MACE than females (8% vs. 3%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified no sex-based differences in risk-stratification or non-invasive testing when the CDP was used. High risk males, however, underwent more coronary angiogram and PCI than high risk females, and consequently males experienced more overall MACE than females. This disparity may be explained by sex-based differences in the pathophysiology driving each patient's presentation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Coronariana Aguda / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Coronariana Aguda / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article