Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A qualitative study of primary care clinician's approach to ending cervical cancer screening in older women in the United States.
Holt, Hunter K; Flores, Rey; James, Jennifer E; Waters, Catherine; Kaplan, Celia P; Peterson, Caryn E; Sawaya, George F.
Afiliação
  • Holt HK; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
  • Flores R; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
  • James JE; Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, and UCSF Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Waters C; Department of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
  • Kaplan CP; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine University of California, San Francisco, USA.
  • Peterson CE; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
  • Sawaya GF; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Prev Med Rep ; 36: 102500, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38116273
ABSTRACT
The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that cervical cancer screening end in average-risk patients with a cervix at 65 years of age if adequate screening measures have been met, defined as having 1) at least three normal consecutive cytology (Pap) tests, or 2) two normal cytology tests and/or two negative high-risk human papillomavirus tests between ages 55-65; the last test should be performed within the prior 5 years. Up to 60 % of all women aged 65 years and older who are ending screening do not meet the criteria for adequate screening. The objective of this study was to understand the process and approach that healthcare clinicians use to determine eligibility to end cervical cancer screening. In 2021 we conducted semi-structured interviews in San Francisco, CA with twelve healthcare clinicians two family medicine physicians, three general internal medicine physicians, two obstetrician/gynecologists and five nurse practitioners. Thematic analysis, using inductive and deductive coding, was utilized. Three major themes emerged following guidelines, relying on self-reported data regarding prior screening, and considering sexual activity as a factor in the decision to end screening. All interviewees endorsed following the USPSTF guidelines and they utilized self-report to determine eligibility to end screening. Clinicians' approach was dependent in part on their judgement about the reliability of the patient to convey their screening history. Sexual activity of the patient was considered when making clinical recommendations. Shared decision-making was often utilized. Clinicians voiced a strong reliance on self-reported screening history to end cervical cancer screening.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article