Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of Uveitis in Patients With Axial Spondylarthritis Treated With Biologics or Targeted Synthetics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Bechman, Katie; Yang, Zijing; Adas, Maryam; Nagra, Deepak; S Uguzlar, Ali; Russell, Mark D; Wilson, Nicky; Steer, Sophia; Norton, Sam; Galloway, James.
Afiliação
  • Bechman K; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Yang Z; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Adas M; King's College London, London, United Kingdom, and University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Nagra D; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • S Uguzlar A; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Russell MD; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Wilson N; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Steer S; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Norton S; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Galloway J; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 76(5): 704-714, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38116697
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Anterior uveitis is a common extra-articular manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). We set to evaluate the risk of anterior uveitis (AU) with biologics and synthetic disease-modifying drugs in AxSpA.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify phase II/III double-blinded randomized controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies (mAb), anti-interleukin-17 (anti-IL-17), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in AxSpA. Patient-exposure years (PEY) were calculated using the per-protocol approach. Incidence rate (IR) of AU/100 person-years were calculated by treatment group using the random effects approach. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to estimate risk of AU in treatment groups, expressed as IR ratios (IRRs). Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool.

RESULTS:

Forty-four trials were included 17 anti-TNF mAb (1,004 PEY), 9 etanercept (180 PEY), 13 anti-IL-17 (1,834 PEY), and 6 JAKi (331 PEY). The IR of AU were as follows for anti-TNF mAb 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-8.5; etanercept 5.4, 95% CI 0-16.0; anti-IL-17 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-4.1; JAKi 1.5, 95% CI 0.0-3.0; and placebo 10.8, 95% CI 7.4-14.1. In NMA, IRRs of treatments compared with placebo were as follows for anti-TNF mAb 0.32, 95% CI 0.10-1.04; etanercept 0.42, 95% CI 0.08-2.38; anti-IL-17 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.98; and JAKi 0.32, 95% CI 0.06-1.67. Comparisons between anti-TNF mAb, anti-IL-17, and JAKi did not demonstrate any significant difference in AU risk. Using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve approach to rank AU risk, anti-TNF mAbs were associated with the lowest risk followed by JAKi, anti-IL-17, and etanercept. All treatments were ranked superior to placebo.

CONCLUSION:

Anti-TNF mAbs, JAKi, and anti-IL-17 appear protective against AU events in individuals with AxSpA, with no significant differences in risk of AU between treatments.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Antirreumáticos / Metanálise em Rede / Espondiloartrite Axial Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Antirreumáticos / Metanálise em Rede / Espondiloartrite Axial Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article