Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Out-of-pocket spending and health care utilization associated with initiation of different medications for opioid use disorder: Findings from a national commercially insured cohort.
McCann, Nicole C; LaRochelle, Marc R; Morgan, Jake R.
Afiliação
  • McCann NC; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, United States of America. Electronic address: ncmccann@bu.edu.
  • LaRochelle MR; Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, United States of America.
  • Morgan JR; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, United States of America.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 159: 209281, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38122988
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Buprenorphine and naltrexone are effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Naltrexone requires complete detoxification from opioids before initiation while buprenorphine does not, which leads to a differential clinical induction challenge. Few studies have evaluated economic costs associated with MOUD initiation.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the 2014-2019 Merative MarketScan database. We included individuals diagnosed with opioid use, abuse, or dependence from 2014 to 2019 who initiated one of three MOUD types 1) buprenorphine, 2) extended-release naltrexone, or 3) oral naltrexone. We calculated total and monthly out-of-pocket spending, for overall and MOUD-specific claims, for the three months prior through three months after MOUD initiation. We also calculated utilization of detoxification, inpatient, and outpatient services monthly over this period.

RESULTS:

Our cohort included 27,133 individuals; 19,536, 1886, and 5711 initiated buprenorphine, extended-release naltrexone, and oral naltrexone, respectively. Individuals who initiated naltrexone had the highest out-of-pocket spending over the study period. MOUD-specific spending did not contribute substantially to total out-of-pocket spending. Difference in overall spending by MOUD type was driven by a subset of individuals who initiated naltrexone and had very high out-of-pocket spending in the month prior to MOUD initiation. In this month, mean monthly out-of-pocket spending for high-spenders (above 90th percentile within MOUD type category) was $5734 (95 % confidence interval [CI] $5181-$6286) and $4622 (95 % CI $4161-$5082) for those who initiated oral and extended-release naltrexone, respectively, compared with $1852 (95 % CI $1754-$1950) for those who initiated buprenorphine. In the month prior to MOUD initiation, those who initiated naltrexone also had higher detoxification, inpatient, and outpatient episode/visit frequency. In the month prior to initiation, 28.8 % (95 % CI 27.7 %-30.0 %) and 25.5 % (95 % CI 23.6 %-27.5 %) of individuals who initiated oral and extended-release naltrexone had detoxification episodes, compared with 9.7 % (95 % CI 9.3 %-10.1 %) of those who initiated buprenorphine.

CONCLUSION:

Findings suggest that individuals who initiated naltrexone utilized more intensive health services, including detoxification, in the period prior to MOUD initiation, resulting in significantly higher out-of-pocket spending. Out-of-pocket spending is a patient-centered outcome reflecting potential patient burden. Our results should be considered as part of the shared decision-making process between patients and providers when choosing treatment for OUD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Buprenorfina / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Buprenorfina / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article