Tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: infant cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure prongs.
J Perinatol
; 44(2): 244-249, 2024 Feb.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38129599
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To measure tidal volume delivery during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation with two nasal interfaces infant cannula and nasal prongs. STUDYDESIGN:
A single-center crossover study of neonates with mild respiratory distress. Fifteen preterm neonates were randomized to initial interface of infant cannula or nasal prongs and monitored on a sequence of pressure settings first on the initial interface, then repeated on the alternate interface. We compared relative tidal volumes between the two interfaces with two-way repeated measures ANOVA during three breath types synchronized (I), patient effort without ventilator breaths (II), and ventilator breaths without patient effort (III). Clinical trial #NCT04326270.RESULTS:
Type III breaths delivered no significant tidal volume. No significant difference was measured in relative tidal volume delivery between the interfaces when breath types were matched.CONCLUSIONS:
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation delivers neither clinically nor statistically significant tidal volume with either infant cannula or nasal prongs.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Recém-Nascido Prematuro
/
Ventilação com Pressão Positiva Intermitente
Limite:
Humans
/
Infant
/
Newborn
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article