Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined with Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Xu, Xiaomin; Xu, Mei; Su, Yon; Cao, Thanh Vinh; Nikolin, Stevan; Moffa, Adriano; Loo, Colleen; Martin, Donel.
Afiliação
  • Xu X; Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Xu M; Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Su Y; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
  • Cao TV; Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Nikolin S; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
  • Moffa A; Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
  • Loo C; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
  • Martin D; Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faulty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Brain Sci ; 13(12)2023 Nov 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38137113
ABSTRACT
(1)

Background:

Psychological interventions are effective in alleviating neuropsychiatric symptoms, though results can vary between patients. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been proven to improve clinical symptoms and cognition. It remains unclear whether rTMS can augment the efficacy of psychological interventions. (2)

Methods:

We examined the effects of rTMS combined with psychological interventions on clinical, functional, and cognitive outcomes from randomized controlled trials conducted in healthy and clinical populations. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases up to April 2023. (3)

Results:

Twenty-seven studies were ultimately included. Compared to sham rTMS combined with psychological interventions, active rTMS combined with psychological interventions significantly improved overall clinical symptoms (k = 16, SMD = 0.31, CIs 0.08 to 0.54, p < 0.01). We found that 10 or more sessions of rTMS combined with cognitive behavioural therapy significantly improved clinical outcomes overall (k = 3, SMD = 0.21, CIs 0.05 to 0.36, Z = 2.49, p < 0.01). RTMS combined with cognitive training (CT) significantly improved cognition overall compared to sham rTMS combined with CT (k = 13, SMD = 0.28, CIs 0.15 to 0.42, p < 0.01), with a significant effect on global cognition (k = 11, SMD = 0.45, CIs 0.21 to 0.68, p < 0.01), but not on the other cognitive domains. (4)

Conclusion:

The current results provide preliminary support for the augmentation effects of active rTMS on clinical and cognitive outcomes across diverse populations. Future clinical trials are required to confirm these augmentation effects for specific psychological interventions in specific clinical populations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article