Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety & feasibility of responsive neurostimulation in children with refractory epilepsy: A single-center experience.
Enner, Stephanie; El-Hallal, Maria; Hogan, Katherine; Rodgers, Shaun; Karkare, Shefali; Kothare, Sanjeev.
Afiliação
  • Enner S; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 2001 Marcus Avenue Suite W290, Lake Success, NY 11042, United States. Electronic address: senner@northwell.edu.
  • El-Hallal M; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 2001 Marcus Avenue Suite W290, Lake Success, NY 11042, United States.
  • Hogan K; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 2001 Marcus Avenue Suite W290, Lake Success, NY 11042, United States.
  • Rodgers S; Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 410 Lakeville Road, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.
  • Karkare S; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 2001 Marcus Avenue Suite W290, Lake Success, NY 11042, United States.
  • Kothare S; Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 2001 Marcus Avenue Suite W290, Lake Success, NY 11042, United States.
Seizure ; 114: 121-124, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141494
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a relatively recent addition to the epilepsy surgery armory, gaining FDA approval in 2013 for use in adults with intractable focal epilepsy. Data for the use of RNS system in patients less than 18 years of age is limited. We aim to determine the safety and feasibility of RNS in children with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent RNS implantation at an urban tertiary children's hospital. Demographics of the patients were obtained, including age at the time of implant, MRI findings, seizure onset zone identification, and RNS targets.

RESULTS:

Out of a fourteen patient cohort, one patient had a post-operative complication of infection at surgical site requiring explantation. Thirteen out of 14 patients had immediate post-operative head imaging that was negative for hemorrhage, infarction, or skull fracture; one patient did not undergo head imaging. No patients reported a worsening clinical seizure frequency at a 6-month follow up visit. In the subset of patients who were implanted with RNS and did not undergo concurrent resections, there was a statistically significant reduction in the average number of long episodes at the most recent visit when compared to the 1-month post-operative visit (p = 0.0268).

CONCLUSIONS:

RNS is a feasible and safe option for children as young as six years with refractory epilepsy when appropriate seizure focus identification has been performed with stereo CT and stereo EEG evaluations, and can be used in conjunction with other surgical epilepsy treatment modalities. Two canister RNS placement is achievable for patients with a broad epileptogenic network or multifocal seizure onset zones.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article