Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blueprint designing and validation for competency-based curriculum for theory assessment in community medicine.
Mathur, Medha; Verma, Anjana; Mathur, Navgeet; Kumar, Dewesh; Meena, Jitendra Kumar; Nayak, Smrutiranjan; Gaiki, Varun; Parmar, Piyushkumar.
Afiliação
  • Mathur M; Associate Professor (Community Medicine), Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Verma A; Associate Professor (General Medicine), Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Mathur N; Associate Professor (General Medicine), Geetanjali Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Kumar D; Assistant Professor (Community Medicine), Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
  • Meena JK; Assistant Professor, Preventive Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
  • Nayak S; Professor (Community Medicine), Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
  • Gaiki V; Professor (Community Medicine), Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Parmar P; Associate Professor (Community Medicine), Smt.B.K.Shah Medical Institute & Research Center, Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Med J Armed Forces India ; 79(Suppl 1): S47-S53, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38144616
ABSTRACT

Background:

Blueprint provides a base for assessment by assigning proportionate weightage to various content areas and helps the paper setter to construct a uniform and valid assessment. This study aimed to design and validate a blueprint for theory in Community Medicine as per the new curriculum for Medical Undergraduates in India.

Methods:

Blueprint in community medicine was designed by assigning impact score (I) and frequency score (F) for the competencies. Blueprint was validated using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and inter-rater agreement for subject experts using Fleiss' kappa statistics was calculated. Feedback from faculty and students was obtained afterward to assess the postimplementation response.

Results:

Blueprint was designed by an expert group where impact score and frequency score were assigned to 146 competencies in the theory of Community Medicine. In Delphi survey I, 63.2% of subject experts responded, while in Delphi survey II, a response rate of 58.3% was achieved. Value of the Fleiss' Kappa test for an inter-rater agreement was 0.68, i.e. "substantial agreement," while CVI among the raters came out to be 0.86, i.e. overall valid assessment. Feedback of faculty (n = 11) suggested that the blueprint was helpful and standardized the paper setting, whereas feedback from students (n = 138) depicted that it helped in preparing for exams, and they would recommend it to other students.

Conclusion:

Validated blueprint by consensus of subject experts has impact score and frequency score along with topic-wise distribution of marks for the convenience of faculty and its utility is well proven among learners too.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article