Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unmet Sexual Health Resource Needs and Preferences for Interventions to Address These Needs Among Female Partners of Patients With Prostate Cancer.
Gupta, Natasha; Zebib, Laura; Wittmann, Daniela; Nelson, Christian J; Salter, Carolyn A; Mulhall, John P; Byrne, Nataliya; Nolasco, Tatiana Sanchez; Schofield, Elizabeth; Loeb, Stacy.
Afiliação
  • Gupta N; Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY. Electronic address: natasha.gupta@nyulangone.org.
  • Zebib L; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Wittmann D; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Nelson CJ; Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Salter CA; Department of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA.
  • Mulhall JP; Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Byrne N; Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
  • Nolasco TS; Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
  • Schofield E; Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Loeb S; Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
Urology ; 184: 19-25, 2024 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160766
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To characterize unmet sexual health resource needs and preferences for interventions to address unmet needs among female partners of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), given the significant negative impact of PCa on the sexual health of partners.

METHODS:

We conducted an exploratory sequential mixed methods study of female partners recruited from multiple U.S. clinical locations, websites, and support groups for caregivers. We first conducted semistructured in-depth interviews. Qualitative results informed development of a cross-sectional survey, which was administered to a larger sample of partners.

RESULTS:

Overall, 12 and 200 female partners participated in the qualitative and quantitative portions of the study. Major emergent themes from interviews were the benefits and drawbacks of technology-based interventions, the importance of sexual health resources throughout the PCa journey, and a desire for sexual health support groups that include partners. In the survey, the most common sexual health topics that partners wanted more information about were male libido problems (30.0%), erectile dysfunction (26.5%), and female libido and arousal problems (24.5%). Additionally, 41.5% wanted more information about sexual health websites, 35.0% about partners-only support groups, 29.5% about support groups for couples, and 23.5% about sexual medicine specialists.

CONCLUSIONS:

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date on female partners' unmet sexual health resource needs and preferences for sexual health interventions. Partners prefer technology-based interventions, desire sexual health-focused support groups, and want more information about a variety of sexual issues and specialists who treat them.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Saúde Sexual Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Saúde Sexual Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article