Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differentiation of multiple brain metastases and glioblastoma with multiple foci using MRI criteria.
Müller, Sebastian Johannes; Khadhraoui, Eya; Ernst, Marielle; Rohde, Veit; Schatlo, Bawarjan; Malinova, Vesna.
Afiliação
  • Müller SJ; Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Khadhraoui E; Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Ernst M; Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Rohde V; Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Schatlo B; Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Malinova V; Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
BMC Med Imaging ; 24(1): 3, 2024 01 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166651
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Glioblastoma with multiple foci (mGBM) and multiple brain metastases share several common features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A reliable preoperative diagnosis would be of clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to explore the differences and similarities between mGBM and multiple brain metastases on MRI.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 patients with mGBM and compared them with a cohort of 50 patients with multiple brain metastases (2-10 lesions) histologically confirmed and treated at our department between 2015 and 2020. The following imaging characteristics were analyzed lesion location, distribution, morphology, (T2-/FLAIR-weighted) connections between the lesions, patterns of contrast agent uptake, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-values within the lesion, the surrounding T2-hyperintensity, and edema distribution.

RESULTS:

A total of 210 brain metastases and 181 mGBM lesions were analyzed. An infratentorial localization was found significantly more often in patients with multiple brain metastases compared to mGBM patients (28 vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). A T2-connection between the lesions was detected in 63% of mGBM lesions compared to 1% of brain metastases. Cortical edema was only present in mGBM. Perifocal edema with larger areas of diffusion restriction was detected in 31% of mGBM patients, but not in patients with metastases.

CONCLUSION:

We identified a set of imaging features which improve preoperative diagnosis. The presence of T2-weighted imaging hyperintensity connection between the lesions and cortical edema with varying ADC-values was typical for mGBM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article