Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Accuracy of Intestinal Ultrasound in the Detection of Intra-Abdominal Complications in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pruijt, Maarten J; de Voogd, Floris A E; Montazeri, Nahid S M; van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S; D'Haens, Geert R; Gecse, Krisztina B.
Afiliação
  • Pruijt MJ; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Voogd FAE; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Montazeri NSM; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Etten-Jamaludin FS; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Library, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • D'Haens GR; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gecse KB; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Crohns Colitis ; 18(6): 958-972, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173288
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Crohn's disease [CD] is frequently associated with the development of strictures and penetrating complications. Intestinal ultrasound [IUS] is a non-invasive imaging modality ideal for point-of-care assessment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we provide a current overview on the diagnostic accuracy of IUS and its advanced modalities in the detection of intra-abdominal complications in CD compared to endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, surgery, and pathology.

METHOD:

We conducted a literature search for studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of IUS in adult patients with CD-related intra-abdominal complications. Quality of the included studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed for both conventional IUS [B-mode] and oral contrast IUS [SICUS].

RESULTS:

Of the 1498 studies we identified, 68 were included in this review and 23 studies [3863 patients] were used for the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivities and specificities for strictures, inflammatory masses, and fistulas by B-mode IUS were 0.81 and 0.90, 0.87 [sensitivities] and 0.95, and 0.67 and 0.97 [specificities], respectively. Pooled overall log diagnostic odds ratios were 3.56, 3.97 and 3.84, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of SICUS were 0.94 and 0.95, 0.91 and 0.97 [sensitivities], and 0.90 and 0.94 [specificities], respectively. The pooled overall log diagnostic odds ratios of SICUS were 4.51, 5.46, and 4.80, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

IUS is accurate for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal complications in CD. As a non-invasive, point-of-care modality, IUS is recommended as the first-line imaging tool if there is a suspicion of CD-related intra-abdominal complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Crohn / Ultrassonografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Crohn / Ultrassonografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article