Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of adding low-dose esketamine to sufentanil and propofol sedation during cervical conization: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
Si, Jiguo; Li, Xiaomin; Wang, Yuqi; Feng, Nianhai; Cui, Min.
Afiliação
  • Si J; Department of Anesthesiology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, China.
  • Li X; Department of Anesthesiology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Anesthesiology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, China.
  • Feng N; Department of Anesthesiology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo, China.
  • Cui M; Department of Anesthesiology, Zibo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Zibo, China. 1165182675@qq.com.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 15, 2024 01 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178016
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cervical conization is a brief but painful procedure that can be performed under sufficient sedation with propofol and opioids. However, this sedation approach comes with a high risk of sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs). Esketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, causes less cardiorespiratory depression than opioids. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding a low dose of esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation as an opioid-reduced regimen.

METHODS:

A total of 122 consecutive patients with ASA I-II, body mass index < 30, and STOP-BANG score < 3 who underwent cervical conization were enrolled and randomly divided into Group S and Group ES. Using a closed-loop target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump with a target bispectral index (BIS) value of 60 ± 5, patients in Group S were sedated with 0.2 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol, while patients in Group ES were sedated with 0.15 mg·kg-1 esketamine, 0.1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of SRAEs, while the secondary outcomes included effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient and gynaecologist satisfaction.

RESULTS:

Data from 120 patients were analysed. The incidence of composite SRAEs was significantly higher in Group S than in Group ES (85.0% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the severity of SRAEs was higher in Group S than in Group ES (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or patient and gynaecologist satisfaction between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

Adding low-dose esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation reduces the incidence and severity of SRAEs in patients undergoing cervical conization, with equal sedation efficacy, recovery quality, and no additional psychomimetic side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR2000040457 , 28/11/2020.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Sufentanil / Conização / Ketamina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Sufentanil / Conização / Ketamina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article