Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Privacy and confidentiality in Massachusetts' post-overdose outreach programs: Mixed methods analysis of outreach staff surveys and interviews.
Beaugard, Corinne A; Formica, Scott W; Cummins, Emily R; Bagley, Sarah M; Beletsky, Leo; Green, Traci C; Murray, Stephen P; Yan, Shapei; Xuan, Ziming; Walley, Alexander Y; Carroll, Jennifer J.
Afiliação
  • Beaugard CA; Boston University School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: Corinneb@bu.edu.
  • Formica SW; Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc., 84 Mill St., Lincoln, MA 01773, United States.
  • Cummins ER; Ariadne Labs, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 405 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
  • Bagley SM; Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States.
  • Beletsky L; Northeastern University School of Law, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and the Action Lab 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
  • Green TC; The Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Institute for Behavioral Health, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, United States.
  • Murray SP; Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States.
  • Yan S; Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States.
  • Xuan Z; Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Crosstown Building - CT 454, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
  • Walley AY; Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States.
  • Carroll JJ; Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University, 10 Current Drive, Raleigh, NC 27605, United States.
Int J Drug Policy ; 124: 104310, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181671
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Public health-public safety partnerships for post-overdose outreach have emerged in many communities to prevent future overdose events. These efforts often identify overdose survivors through emergency call data and seek to link them with relevant services. The aim of this study was to describe how post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts manage the confidentiality of identifiable information and privacy of survivors.

METHODS:

In 2019, 138 Massachusetts programs completed surveys eliciting responses to questions about program operations. Descriptive statistics were calculated from the closed-ended survey responses. Thirty-eight interviews were conducted among outreach staff members during 2019-2020. Interview transcripts and open-ended survey responses were thematically analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches.

RESULTS:

Of programs that completed the survey, 90 % (n = 124/138) reported acting to protect the privacy of survivors following overdose events, and 84 % (n = 114/135) reported implementing a protocol to maintain the confidentiality of personal information. Interviews with outreach team members indicated substantial variation in practice. Outreach programs regularly employed discretion in determining actions in the field, sometimes undermining survivor privacy and confidentiality (e.g., by disclosing the overdose event to family members). Programs aiming to prioritize privacy and confidentiality attempted to make initial contact with survivors by phone, limited or concealed materials left behind when no one was home, and/or limited the number of contact attempts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the establishment of privacy and confidentiality protocols within most post-overdose outreach programs, application of these procedures was varied, discretionary, and at times viewed by staff as competing with engagement efforts. Individual outreach overdose teams should prioritize privacy and confidentiality during outreach to protect overdose survivors from undesired exposure. In addition to individual program changes, access to overdose survivor information could be changed across all programs to bolster privacy and confidentiality protocols. For example, transitioning the management of overdose-related information to non-law enforcement agencies would limit officers' ability to disseminate such information at their discretion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Privacidade / Overdose de Drogas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Privacidade / Overdose de Drogas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article