Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated-detection of risky alcohol use prior to surgery using natural language processing.
Vydiswaran, V G Vinod; Strayhorn, Asher; Weber, Katherine; Stevens, Haley; Mellinger, Jessica; Winder, G Scott; Fernandez, Anne C.
Afiliação
  • Vydiswaran VGV; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Strayhorn A; School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Weber K; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Stevens H; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Mellinger J; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Winder GS; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Fernandez AC; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken) ; 48(1): 153-163, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189663
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preoperative risky alcohol use is one of the most common surgical risk factors. Accurate and early identification of risky alcohol use could enhance surgical safety. Artificial Intelligence-based approaches, such as natural language processing (NLP), provide an innovative method to identify alcohol-related risks from patients' electronic health records (EHR) before surgery.

METHODS:

Clinical notes (n = 53,629) from pre-operative patients in a tertiary care facility were analyzed for evidence of risky alcohol use and alcohol use disorder. One hundred of these records were reviewed by experts and labeled for comparison. A rule-based NLP model was built, and we assessed the clinical notes for the entire population. Additionally, we assessed each record for the presence or absence of alcohol-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes as an additional comparator.

RESULTS:

NLP correctly identified 87% of the human-labeled patients classified with risky alcohol use. In contrast, diagnosis codes alone correctly identified only 29% of these patients. In terms of specificity, NLP correctly identified 84% of the non-risky cohort, while diagnosis codes correctly identified 90% of this cohort. In the analysis of the full dataset, the NLP-based approach identified three times more patients with risky alcohol use than ICD codes.

CONCLUSIONS:

NLP, an artificial intelligence-based approach, efficiently and accurately identifies alcohol-related risk in patients' EHRs. This approach could supplement other alcohol screening tools to identify patients in need of intervention, treatment, and/or postoperative withdrawal prophylaxis. Alcohol-related ICD diagnosis had limited utility relative to NLP, which extracts richer information within clinical notes to classify patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article