Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing cost-effectiveness threshold in China: a community survey of willingness to pay for a healthylife year.
Xu, Lizheng; Chen, Mingsheng; Angell, Blake; Jiang, Yawen; Howard, Kirsten; Jan, Stephen; Si, Lei.
Afiliação
  • Xu L; The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Chen M; Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China cms@njmu.edu.cn.
  • Angell B; The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jiang Y; Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • Howard K; Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jan S; School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Si L; The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health ; 9(1)2024 01 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195152
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year gained (WTP/Q) is commonly used to determine whether an intervention is cost-effective in health technology assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the WTP/Q for different disease scenarios in a Chinese population.

METHODS:

The study employed a quadruple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method to estimate the WTP/Q in the general public. The estimation was conducted across chronic, terminal and rare disease scenarios. Face-to-face interviews were conducted in a Chinese general population recruited from Jiangsu province using a convenience sampling method. Interval regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between respondents' demographic and socioeconomic conditions and WTP/Q. Sensitivity analyses of removing protest responses and open question analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

A total of 896 individuals participated in the study. The WTP/Q thresholds were 128 000 Chinese renminbi (RMB) ($36 364) for chronic diseases, 149 500 RMB ($42 472) for rare diseases and 140 800 RMB ($40 000) for terminal diseases, equivalent to 1.76, 2.06 and 1.94 times the gross domestic product per capita in China, respectively. The starting bid value had a positive influence on participants' WTP/Q. Additionally, residing in an urban area (p<0.01), and higher household expenditure (p<0.01), educational attainment (p<0.02) and quality of life (p<0.02) were significantly associated with higher WTP/Q. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION:

This study implies that tailored or varied rather than a single cost-effectiveness threshold could better reflect community preferences for the value of a healthy year. Our estimates hold significance in informing reimbursement decision-making in health technology assessment in China.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article