Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without neck pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
AlDahas, Ahmad; Heneghan, Nicola R; Althobaiti, Shouq; Deane, Janet A; Rushton, Alison; Falla, Deborah.
Afiliação
  • AlDahas A; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Heneghan NR; Department of Physical Therapy, Al-Sabah Medical Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
  • Althobaiti S; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Deane JA; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Rushton A; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Falla D; School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 44, 2024 Jan 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38200520
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Proprioception can be impaired in people with neck pain. The cervical joint position sense test, which measures joint position error (JPE), is the most common test used to assess neck proprioception. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the measurement properties of this test for the assessment of people with and without neck pain.

METHODS:

This systematic review was registered prospectively on Prospero (CRD42020188715). It was designed using the COSMIN guidelines and reported in line with the PRISMA checklist. Two reviewers independently searched Medline, Embase, SportDiscus, and CINAHL Plus databases from inception to the 24th July 2022 with an update of the search conducted until 14th of October 2023. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in each study. The updated criteria for good measurement properties were used to rate individual studies and then the overall pooled results. The level of evidence was rated by two reviewers independently using a modified GRADE approach.

RESULTS:

Fifteen studies were included in this review, 13 reporting absolute JPE and 2 reporting constant JPE. The measurement properties assessed were reliability, measurement error, and validity. The measurement of JPE showed sufficient reliability and validity, however, the level of evidence was low/very low for both measurement properties, apart from convergent validity of the constant JPE, which was high.

CONCLUSION:

The measure of cervical JPE showed sufficient reliability and validity but with low/very low levels of evidence. Further studies are required to investigate the reliability and validity of this test as well as the responsiveness of the measure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cervicalgia / Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cervicalgia / Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article