Measurement of the retinal venous pressure with a new instrument in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
; 262(5): 1633-1639, 2024 May.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38214734
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the results of retinal venous pressure (RVP) measurement performed with contact lens dynamometry (CLD) and with the new IOPstim.METHODS:
In this cross-sectional study, we included 36 patients with primary open angle glaucoma with a median age (Q25; Q75) of 74 (64; 77) years (m/f = 18/18), baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) 13.9 (12.2; 15.1) mmHg. Median mean defect - 5.8 (- 11.9; - 2.6) db. Principle of the IOPstim an empty balloon with a diameter of 8 mm is positioned on the eye, laterally of the limbus. Under observation of the central retinal vein (CRV), the examiner inflates the balloon. As soon as the CRV starts pulsation, the inflation is stopped and the IOP is measured, equaling the RVP at this moment. In the CLD, the pulsation of the CRV is observed with a contact lens. The RVP is calculated from the attachment force applied when pulsation appears. COURSE OF EXAMINATIONS Three single measurements of RVP in quick succession with both methods. The sequence of the two methods was randomized. The means of the three RVP measurements were compared.RESULTS:
Pressures in mmHg. RVP IOPstim 19.4 ± 5.4 (mean ± SD), CLD 20.3 ± 5.9. Range of three single measurements IOPstim 2.9 ± 1.5, CLD 2.2 ± 1.1. The differences were RVPIOPstim - RVPCLD = - 0.94 ± 1.15, and approximately normally distributed. Bland-Altmananalysis:
only one data point was 0.5 mmHg higher than the upper line of agreement. The confidence interval of this line was 0.65 mmHg. Concordance correlation coefficient according to Lin (CCC) 0.96. Intraclass correlation coefficient both methods, 0.94.CONCLUSION:
In both methods, the range of the single measurements may be taken as a sign of good reliability, the CCC of 0.96 as a sign of a very good agreement. At the mean, the IOPstim RVP values were 1 mmHg lower than those obtained with the CLD. This difference may be due to the different directions of the prevailing force vectors induced by the instruments. The IOPstim seems applicable in glaucoma diagnostics.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article