Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Boomerang Modification of the Septal Extension Graft: Graft Design and Functional Outcomes.
Peters, R Daniel; Vasudev, Milind; Hakimi, Amir A; Dilley, Katelyn K; Nguyen, Theodore V; Hu, Allison; Wong, Brian J F.
Afiliação
  • Peters RD; Raleigh Capitol Ear, Nose, and Throat, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
  • Vasudev M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Hakimi AA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Dilley KK; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Nguyen TV; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
  • Hu A; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Wong BJF; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 26(4): 469-474, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215259
ABSTRACT

Background:

A "boomerang" graft is an end-to-end caudal septal extension graft (SEG) that conforms to the geometry of the anterior septal angle, and avoids septal overlap, unlike a side-to-side SEG.

Objective:

To compare breathing improvements in rhinoplasty patients receiving boomerang SEGs and patients receiving side-to-side SEGs.

Methods:

Retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing rhinoplasty with either end-to-end boomerang SEG or a side-to-side SEG. Functional outcomes were assessed through the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) survey.

Results:

The boomerang SEG cohort had a mean age of 34 years and were 68% female compared with 38 years and 67% female in the side-to-side SEG cohort (p > 0.05). The cohorts did not differ in the proportion of the lateral crural tensioning, spreader graft placement, or history of rhinoplasty. The boomerang cohort demonstrated a 67% reduction in NOSE scores compared with a 70% reduction among the side-to-side SEG cohort (p = 0.14). Men undergoing boomerang graft placement reported significantly less postoperative functional improvement than men undergoing placement of a side-to-side SEG (62% vs. 77%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion:

Use of a boomerang graft is not likely to negatively affect rhinoplasty functional outcomes when compared with a side-to-side SEG.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rinoplastia / Obstrução Nasal / Septo Nasal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rinoplastia / Obstrução Nasal / Septo Nasal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article