Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"I Wasn't Expecting That Question": Responses to Requests for Abortion Referral at College Student Health Centers.
Anand, Priyanka; Bravo, Licia; Gutman, Sarah; McAllister, Arden; Keddem, Shimrit; Sonalkar, Sarita.
Afiliação
  • Anand P; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
  • Bravo L; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Gutman S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • McAllister A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: arden.mcallister@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Keddem S; Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Sonalkar S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Womens Health Issues ; 34(2): 148-155, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246793
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Women 18-24 years of age have the highest proportion of unintended pregnancies of any age group, and thus represent a significant population in need of abortion services. Prior research indicated that only half of college student health centers provide appropriate abortion referrals. Our objective was to better understand the referral experience and barriers to abortion referral at college student health centers. PROCEDURES We conducted a "secret caller" study at all 4-year colleges in Pennsylvania between June 2017 and April 2018, using a structured script requesting abortion referral. Calls were transcribed, coded using an iteratively developed codebook, and analyzed for themes related to barriers and facilitators of abortion referral. MAIN

FINDINGS:

A total of 202 completed transcripts were reviewed. Themes that emerged were knowledge, experience, and comfort with abortion referral; support, empathy, and reassurance; coercion; misleading language; questioning the caller's autonomy; and institutional policy against referral. Most staff lacked knowledge and comfort with abortion referral. Although some staff members made supportive statements toward the caller, others used coercive language to try to dissuade the caller from an abortion. Many staff cited religious institutional policies against abortion referral and expressed a range of feelings about such policies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Abortion referrals at student health centers lack consistency. Staff members frequently did not have the knowledge needed to provide appropriate abortion referrals, used coercive language in responding to requests for referrals, and perpetuated abortion stigma. Some health staff used coercive or evasive language that further stigmatized the caller's request for an abortion referral. College health centers should improve training and resources around abortion referral to ensure they are delivering appropriate, high-quality care.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article