Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings-An Interview Study.
Koco, Lejla; Siebers, Carmen C N; Schlooz, Margrethe; Meeuwis, Carla; Oldenburg, Hester S A; Prokop, Mathias; Mann, Ritse M.
Afiliação
  • Koco L; Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Siebers CCN; Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Schlooz M; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Meeuwis C; Department of Radiology, Rijnstate, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • Oldenburg HSA; Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Prokop M; Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Mann RM; Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(2)2024 Jan 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254891
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

AI-driven clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) hold promise for multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs). This study aimed to uncover the hurdles and aids in implementing CDSSs during breast cancer MDTMs.

METHODS:

Twenty-four core team members from three hospitals engaged in semi-structured interviews, revealing a collective interest in experiencing CDSS workflows in clinical practice. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed anonymously. A standardized approach, 'the framework method', was used to create an analytical framework for data analysis, which was performed by two independent researchers.

RESULTS:

Positive aspects included improved data visualization, time-saving features, automated trial matching, and enhanced documentation transparency. However, challenges emerged, primarily concerning data connectivity, guideline updates, the accuracy of AI-driven suggestions, and the risk of losing human involvement in decision making. Despite the complexities involved in CDSS development and integration, clinicians demonstrated enthusiasm to explore its potential benefits.

CONCLUSIONS:

Acknowledging the multifaceted nature of this challenge, insights into the barriers and facilitators identified in this study offer a potential roadmap for smoother future implementations. Understanding these factors could pave the way for more effective utilization of CDSSs in breast cancer MDTMs, enhancing patient care through informed decision making.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article