Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adaptive Lung Radiation Therapy in the Era of Immunotherapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Portal, Daniella; Lu, Shou-En; Piperdi, Huzaifa; Jabbour, Salma K; Reyhan, Meral.
Afiliação
  • Portal D; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State of New Jersey University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
  • Lu SE; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State of New Jersey University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
  • Piperdi H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
  • Jabbour SK; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State of New Jersey University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
  • Reyhan M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 9(1): 101315, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38260217
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer consists of concurrent chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy. Though this combination has been shown to have a benefit in both progression-free survival and overall survival, treatment is often limited by the development of pneumonitis. One way to mitigate toxicity is through adaptive radiation therapy, which does not currently have a standardized implementation in clinical practice. Methods and Materials A single-center retrospective review of patients with locally advanced stage III or oligometastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with chemoradiation with concurrent or subsequent immunotherapy from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Patients were stratified based on having 1 or more offline adapted plan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-volume histogram values and common toxicities experienced during this treatment, including pneumonitis and esophagitis.

Results:

Twenty-five patients were included in the final

analysis:

10 with adapted plans (AP), and 15 with nonadapted plans (NAP). Mean age at onset was 74 years. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma (N = 13). Five patients experienced pneumonitis 2 in AP and 3 in NAP. Mann-Whitney U test of gross tumor volume sizes between AP (346.2 ± 269.7 cm3) and NAP (153.1 ± 99.6 cm3) was significant (P = .019). Multiple linear regression analysis with adjustment for covariates of pneumonitis versus plan adaptation (P = .106) and esophagitis versus plan adaptation (P = .59) did not demonstrate a significant difference in toxicity between the adapted and nonadaptive patients.

Conclusions:

Despite similar toxicities in both groups, the gross tumor volume size in the AP was more than double compared with NAP, suggesting that adaptive techniques provide a method for patients with larger target volumes to be treated without an observed difference in pneumonitis rates. These results suggest adaptive radiation therapy may have a role in mitigating toxicity experience from chemoradiation and immunotherapy and warrants further investigation.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article