Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children receiving peritoneal dialysis: A tertiary centre long-term experience and literature review.
Fati, Federica; Pulvirenti, Rebecca; Longo, Germana; Antoniello, Luca Maria; Zambaiti, Elisa; Gamba, Piergiorgio.
Afiliação
  • Fati F; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
  • Pulvirenti R; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
  • Longo G; Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
  • Antoniello LM; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
  • Zambaiti E; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
  • Gamba P; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Patologia e Cura del Bambino Department, Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Turin, Italy.
Perit Dial Int ; : 8968608231223812, 2024 Jan 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265012
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Children with severe chronic kidney disease receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) are often malnourished and may require nutritional supplementation. Recent PD guidelines address laparoscopic and open surgical gastrostomy as safe approaches in children established on PD, while existing evidence on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is still lacking; as well as the role of perioperative antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis. Hence, this study aimed to report our experience with PEG placement in patients on PD and compare it with the available literature.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records from patients on PD, who underwent PEG placement at a tertiary referral centre between 2000 and 2020. Data on perioperative management, complications and outcomes were retrieved. An extensive literature search was performed; studies describing PEG placement and perioperative prophylaxis in patients on PD were used as a comparison. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted.

RESULTS:

Seven patients (five males) were included. Perioperative antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis were standard practice. At a median follow-up of 27 months (10-75), the peritonitis rate was 0.2 patient/years. No statistical significance was found between the peritonitis rate before and after PEG placement (p = 0.2). Patients' demographics and postoperative complications were comparable to the reported studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on our experience, our technique of PEG insertion with antimicrobial prophylaxis is feasible and associated with an acceptable complication risk in patients on PD. Further multicentric studies about surgical technique in patients on PD will be necessary to verify the feasibility of PEG and standardise the perioperative protocol.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article