Family responsive care mediating the home visiting effects on left-behind children's early development in rural China.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The early development of left-behind children requires great concern and improvement. Yet, current interventions for left-behind children are mainly focussed on children older than 3. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a home visiting programme on family responsive care and early development of rural left-behind children and examine whether family responsive care mediates the effects of intervention on child development. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design was utilized in this study. A stratified clustered sampling was employed to choose villages in programme towns into intervention group. A control village was matched with every intervention village. All of the left-behind children and their caregivers meeting the inclusion criteria in the chosen villages were enrolled in the survey. The outcomes included child development, caregiver's early stimulation, parent-child communication, and learning materials. Baseline assessments were conducted in 2018, and endline assessments were conducted in 2020. RESULTS: In the endline survey, we enrolled 608 children with 258 in the intervention group and 350 in the control group. Left-behind children in the intervention group were less likely to have development delay compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36, 0.96). Migrant parents of children in the intervention group showed higher proportion of expressing emotional support to their children when communicating (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.05, 2.72). Children who received home visits more than once per 2 months had lower level of suspected development delay than children in the control group (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.18, 0.68). Caregiver's early stimulation and migrant parents' emotional support to left-behind children mediated the intervention dose and left-behind children's development. CONCLUSION: Caregiver's early stimulation mediates the intervention and child's development. The findings suggest a promising future for scaling similar early childhood development interventions for left-behind children in rural settings.