Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 illegitimate? Request for an Opinion.
Goodfellow, Michael; Oren, Aharon; Sangal, Vartul; Sutcliffe, Iain C.
Afiliação
  • Goodfellow M; School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
  • Oren A; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.
  • Sangal V; Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
  • Sutcliffe IC; Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265282
ABSTRACT
In 2014, it was reported that the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 was illegitimate due to the priority of the cyanobacterial genus name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. Since that time, the consequences of this conclusion have been largely ignored, whilst changes have been made to relevant Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, including significant changes to the way in which the Code treats the names of members of Cyanobacteriota. Given the complexity of the nomenclatural issues, we request the opinion of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes as to whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rhodococcus / Ácidos Graxos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rhodococcus / Ácidos Graxos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article