Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex-specific disparities in COVID-19 outcomes.
Rafique, Zubaid; Durkalski-Mauldin, Valerie; Peacock, William F; Yadav, Kabir; Reynolds, Joshua C; Callaway, Clifton W.
Afiliação
  • Rafique Z; Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Henry J N Taub General Hospital Houston Texas USA.
  • Durkalski-Mauldin V; Department of Public Health Sciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
  • Peacock WF; Department of Emergency Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
  • Yadav K; Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles California USA.
  • Reynolds JC; Department of Emergency Medicine Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids Michigan USA.
  • Callaway CW; Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 5(1): e13110, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38283615
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Sex-specific disparities in morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 illness are not well understood. Neutralizing antibodies (Ab) may protect against severe COVID-19 illness. We investigated the association of sex with disease progression and SARS-CoV-2 Ab response.

Methods:

In this exploratory analysis of the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled Convalescent Plasma in Outpatients (C3PO) trial, we examined whether sex was associated with progression to severe illness, defined as a composite of all-cause hospitalization, emergency/urgent care visit, or death within 15 days from study enrollment. Patients had a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test, symptom onset within 7 days, stable condition for emergency department discharge, and were either ≥50 years old or had at least one high-risk feature for disease progression. Patients received blinded convalescent plasma or placebo in a 11 fashion and were evaluated on days 15 and 30 after infusion. Blood samples were collected on day 0 (pre-/post-infusion), 15, and 30 to measure Ab levels with the Broad Institute using the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test assay.

Results:

Of 511 patients enrolled (median age 54 [Iinterquartile range 41-62] years, 46% male, 66% white, 20% black, 3.5% Asian), disease progression occurred in 36.7% of males and 25.9% of females (unadjusted risk difference 10.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-18.8%). Sex-disparities did not persist when adjusted for treatment group, age, viremic status, symptom onset, and tobacco use (adjusted risk difference 5.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.2% to 13.4%), but were present in the subgroup presenting 3 or more days after symptom onset (adjusted risk difference 12.6%, 95% CI, 3.4% to 21.9%). Mean baseline Ab levels (log scale) available for 367 patients were similar between sexes (difference 0.19 log units, 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.46). The log-scale mean increase from baseline to day 15 after adjusting for treatment assignment and baseline levels was larger in males than females (3.26 vs. 2.67). A similar difference was noted when the groups were subdivided by outcome.

Conclusions:

Progression of COVID-19 was similar in males and females when adjusted for age, tobacco use, and viremia status in this study. However, in the cohort presenting 3 or more days after symptom onset, COVID-19 outcomes were worse in males than females. Neutralizing Ab levels increased more in males but did not correlate with sex differences in outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article