Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mechanical thrombectomy using the retrograde semi-retrieval technique for patients with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.
Wang, Wei; Xu, Yongbo; Zhang, Bohao; Liu, Shuling; Ma, Zhenjian; Wang, Sifei; Zhang, Pinyuan; Wei, Ming.
Afiliação
  • Wang W; Department of Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Xu Y; Key Laboratory of Cerebral Vascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tianjin Neurosurgical Institute, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang B; Clinical College of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Neurorehabilitation, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
  • Liu S; Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Ma Z; Department of Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Wang S; Key Laboratory of Cerebral Vascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tianjin Neurosurgical Institute, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Wei M; Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1280181, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38283684
ABSTRACT

Background:

The retrograde semi-retrieval technique (RESET) has been described as a modified technique for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) whose safety and efficacy for intracranial atherosclerosis stenosis (ICAS) patients remain uncertain. This article presents our single-center experience, comparing RESET vs. non-RESET in ICAS patients. Materials and

methods:

We analyzed 327 consecutive ICAS patients who underwent EVT at Tianjin Huanhu Hospital from January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups RESET and non-RESET. The primary outcome was the first-pass effect (FPE). Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion, functional independence at 90 days, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

Results:

RESET was significantly associated with FPE [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-3.87, p = 0.040]. RESET was not significantly associated with successful reperfusion (aOR 1.5, CI 0.55-4.06, p = 0.425), an mRS of 0-2 at 90 days (aOR 1.36, CI 0.83-2.21, p = 0.223), sICH (aOR 0.39, CI 0.12-1.23, p = 0.108), and mortality (aOR 0.49, CI 0.16-1.44, p = 0.193). After propensity score matching, the results were consistent with the primary analysis.

Conclusion:

Compared to non-RESET, patients treated with RESET showed increased FPE incidence and significantly decreased puncture-to-reperfusion time. RESET was proven to be safe and effective in enhancing reperfusion for LVO patients receiving EVT with underlying ICAS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article