Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of the CHIldren with acute COugh (CHICO) intervention to improve antibiotics management: a qualitative study in primary care.
Clement, Clare; Ingram, Jenny; Cabral, Christie; Blair, Peter S; Hay, Alastair D; Seume, Penny; Horwood, Jeremy.
Afiliação
  • Clement C; Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), Bristol.
  • Ingram J; Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Cabral C; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Blair PS; Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Hay AD; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Seume P; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Horwood J; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Br J Gen Pract ; 74(743): e401-e407, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296358
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Childhood respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are common and can lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. The CHIldren with COugh (CHICO) intervention incorporates a clinician-focused algorithm (STARWAVe) to predict future hospitalisation risk, elicitation of carer concerns, and a carer-focused personalised leaflet recording treatment decisions and safety-netting information.

AIM:

To examine the implementation of the CHICO intervention by primary care clinicians. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

A qualitative study with primary care clinicians in England taking part in the CHICO randomised controlled trial.

METHOD:

Interviews explored the CHICO intervention's acceptability and use. Clinicians from a range of practices with high and low antibiotic dispensing rates were recruited. Normalisation process theory underpinned data collection and thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Most clinicians liked the intervention because it was quick and easy to use, it helped elicit carer concerns, and reassured clinicians and carers of the appropriateness of treatment decisions. However, clinicians used it as a supportive aid for treatment decisions rather than as a tool for behaviour change. The accompanying advice leaflet helped explain treatment decisions and support self-care. The intervention did not always align with clinicians' usual processes, which could affect use. Increased familiarisation with the algorithm led to reduced intervention use, which was further reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic as a result of changes to practice and remote consultations.

CONCLUSION:

Clinicians found the CHICO intervention useful to support decision making around antibiotic prescribing and it helped discussions with carers about concerns and treatment decisions. The intervention may need to be adapted to align more with clinicians' consultation flow and remote consultations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Infecções Respiratórias / Tosse / Pesquisa Qualitativa / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Infecções Respiratórias / Tosse / Pesquisa Qualitativa / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article