Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea exhibit differential nitrogen source preferences.
Qin, Wei; Wei, Stephany P; Zheng, Yue; Choi, Eunkyung; Li, Xiangpeng; Johnston, Juliet; Wan, Xianhui; Abrahamson, Britt; Flinkstrom, Zachary; Wang, Baozhan; Li, Hanyan; Hou, Lei; Tao, Qing; Chlouber, Wyatt W; Sun, Xin; Wells, Michael; Ngo, Long; Hunt, Kristopher A; Urakawa, Hidetoshi; Tao, Xuanyu; Wang, Dongyu; Yan, Xiaoyuan; Wang, Dazhi; Pan, Chongle; Weber, Peter K; Jiang, Jiandong; Zhou, Jizhong; Zhang, Yao; Stahl, David A; Ward, Bess B; Mayali, Xavier; Martens-Habbena, Willm; Winkler, Mari-Karoliina H.
Afiliação
  • Qin W; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. weiqin@ou.edu.
  • Wei SP; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. weiqin@ou.edu.
  • Zheng Y; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Choi E; State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Li X; Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, FL, USA.
  • Johnston J; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Wan X; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
  • Abrahamson B; Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Flinkstrom Z; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Wang B; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Li H; College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Hou L; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Tao Q; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Chlouber WW; State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Sun X; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Wells M; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Ngo L; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Hunt KA; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Urakawa H; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Tao X; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Wang D; Department of Ecology and Environmental Studies, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
  • Yan X; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Wang D; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Pan C; State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.
  • Weber PK; State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Jiang J; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Zhou J; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
  • Zhang Y; College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Stahl DA; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
  • Ward BB; State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
  • Mayali X; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Martens-Habbena W; Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Winkler MH; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Nat Microbiol ; 9(2): 524-536, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297167
ABSTRACT
Ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM) contribute to one of the largest nitrogen fluxes in the global nitrogen budget. Four distinct lineages of AOM ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), beta- and gamma-proteobacterial ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (ß-AOB and γ-AOB) and complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox), are thought to compete for ammonia as their primary nitrogen substrate. In addition, many AOM species can utilize urea as an alternative energy and nitrogen source through hydrolysis to ammonia. How the coordination of ammonia and urea metabolism in AOM influences their ecology remains poorly understood. Here we use stable isotope tracing, kinetics and transcriptomics experiments to show that representatives of the AOM lineages employ distinct regulatory strategies for ammonia or urea utilization, thereby minimizing direct substrate competition. The tested AOA and comammox species preferentially used ammonia over urea, while ß-AOB favoured urea utilization, repressed ammonia transport in the presence of urea and showed higher affinity for urea than for ammonia. Characterized γ-AOB co-utilized both substrates. These results reveal contrasting niche adaptation and coexistence patterns among the major AOM lineages.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / Archaea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / Archaea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article