Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of low-temperature partitioning with dispersive solid-phase extraction for quantification of pesticides in apples followed by electrospray-ionization mobility spectrometry: Comparison with conventional procedure.
Liu, Wen; Liu, Fei; Che, Anyi; Chen, Yanjing; Cai, Jiayi; Liu, Wenjie; Jing, Guoxing; Li, Wenshan; Yu, Jianna.
Afiliação
  • Liu W; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China. Electronic address: liuwen@xtu.edu.cn.
  • Liu F; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Che A; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Chen Y; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Cai J; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Liu W; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Jing G; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Li W; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
  • Yu J; School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China. Electronic address: yujianna2000@sina.com.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306956
ABSTRACT
Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) has a promising application prospect in food surveillance. However, due to the complexity of food matrix and trace levels of pesticide residues, the effective and rapid detection of pesticides by IMS has been a challenge, especially when using electrospray ionization (ESI) as an ion source. In this study, low-temperature partitioning with dispersive solid-phase extraction (LTP-dSPE) was explored and compared with conventional procedures. Both methods were validated for the quantification of eight pesticides in apples, obtaining a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.02-0.12 mg/kg for LTP-dSPE and 0.02-0.09 mg/kg for conventional solid-phase extraction (SPE), lower than those usually stipulated by government legislation in food matrices. For LTP-dSPE, the matrx effect (ME) ranged from -16.3 to -68.6 %, lower than that for the SPE method, ranging from -70.0 to -92.9 %. The results showed satisfactory efficiency and precision, with recovery values ranging from 67.9 to 115.4 % for LTP-dSPE and from 62.0 to 114.8 % for conventional SPE, with relative standard deviations below 13.0 %. Notably, the proposed LTP-dSPE/ESI-IMS has been shown to be more cost-effective, easier to use, more environment-friendly, more accessible, and, most importantly, less matrix effect than the conventional method, thereby being suitably applicable to a wide range of food safety applications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Resíduos de Praguicidas / Malus Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Resíduos de Praguicidas / Malus Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article