Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Patient Perspective on Colectomy for Recurrent Diverticulitis: A Qualitative Study.
Hawkins, Alexander T; Penson, David F; Geiger, Timothy M; Bonnet, Kemberlee R; Mutch, Matthew G; Maguire, Lilias H; Schlundt, David G; Rothman, Russell L.
Afiliação
  • Hawkins AT; Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Penson DF; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Geiger TM; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
  • Bonnet KR; Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Mutch MG; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Maguire LH; Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
  • Schlundt DG; Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Rothman RL; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Ann Surg ; 279(5): 818-824, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318711
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Understand the patient's decision-making process regarding colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND:

The decision to pursue elective colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis is highly preference-sensitive. Little is known about the patient's perspective in this decision-making process.

METHODS:

We performed a qualitative study utilizing focus groups of patients with recurrent diverticulitis at 3 centers across the United States. Using an iterative inductive/deductive approach, we developed a conceptual framework to capture the major themes identified in the coded data.

RESULTS:

From March 2019 to July 2020, 39 patients were enrolled across 3 sites and participated in 6 focus groups. After coding the transcripts using a hierarchical coding system, a conceptual framework was developed. Major themes identified included participants' beliefs about surgery, such as normative beliefs (eg, subjective, value placed on surgery), control beliefs (eg, self-efficacy, stage of change), and anticipated outcomes (eg, expectations, anticipated regret); the role of behavioral management strategies (eg, fiber, eliminate bad habits); emotional experiences (eg, depression, embarrassment); current symptoms (eg, severity, timing); and quality of life (eg, cognitive load, psychosocial factors). Three sets of moderating factors influencing patient choice were identified clinical history (eg, source of diagnosis, multiple surgeries), clinical protocols (eg, pre-op and post-op education), and provider-specific factors (eg, specialty, choice of surgeon).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients view the decision to undergo colectomy through 3 major themes their beliefs about surgery, their psychosocial context, and moderating factors that influence participant choice to undergo surgery. This knowledge is essential both for clinicians counseling patients who are considering colectomy and for researchers studying the process to optimize care for recurrent diverticulitis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diverticulite / Doença Diverticular do Colo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diverticulite / Doença Diverticular do Colo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article