Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing AGS Beers 2019, STOPP version 2, and EU(7)-PIM list in Portuguese older adults in primary health care.
Rodrigues, Daniela A; Herdeiro, Maria Teresa; Mateos-Campos, Ramona; Figueiras, Adolfo; Roque, Fátima.
Afiliação
  • Rodrigues DA; Research Laboratory on Epidemiology and Population Health, Polytechnic of Guarda (IPG), 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal.
  • Herdeiro MT; Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.
  • Mateos-Campos R; PhD Student, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Figueiras A; Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Roque F; Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(4): 603-612, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38319349
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aims to identify PIM prevalence in older adults according to the 2019 Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions version 2 (STOPP v2) criteria, and the Portuguese EU(7)-PIM list and also to analyze the concordance between these criteria.

METHODS:

A retrospective study was conducted among 1200 Portuguese older adults (≥ 65 years old), users of primary health care. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data were collected concerning the period between April 2021 and August 2022. A comparative analysis was performed between the three PIM identification criteria, and the concordance was determined according to the Lin concordance correlation coefficient.

RESULTS:

The mean age was 76.3 (SD 7.7) years old and 57.6% of the older adults were females. Our findings indicate varying prevalence rates among these criteria with 63.8% (95% CI 61.0-66.6%), 66.8% (95% CI 64.1-69.5%), and 50.1% (95% CI 47.2-53.0%) of the older adults take at least one PIM according to the EU(7)-PIM list, Beers 2019, and STOPP v2 criteria, respectively. The highest prevalence observed was for proton pump inhibitors according to EU(7)-PIM list (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6-32.9) and Beers criteria (30.1%, 95% CI 27.6-32.9) and alprazolam according to STOPP v2 criteria (10.1%, 95% CI 8.4-11.9%). A poor concordance between criteria was observed (< 0.834). The highest concordance coefficient was found between the EU(7)-PIM list and the Beers criteria (0.833), and the lowest between the EU(7)-PIM list and STOPP criteria (0.735).

CONCLUSION:

This study reveals varying prevalence rates of PIM in older adults, as assessed by different criteria, and highlights the need for targeted interventions and improved prescribing practices. In the future, studies should focus on the occurrence of negative outcomes in older adults associated with PIM consumption.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prescrição Inadequada / Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prescrição Inadequada / Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article