Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image Correlation Between Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs, C-arm Fluoroscopic Radiographs, and X-ray: A Phantom Study.
Wangler, Sebastian; Hofmann, Janic; Moser, Helen L; Kuenzler, Michael; Egli, Rainer J; Schaer, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Wangler S; Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
  • Hofmann J; Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
  • Moser HL; Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
  • Kuenzler M; Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
  • Egli RJ; Diagnostic, Interventional, and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
  • Schaer M; Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, CHE.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51868, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38327943
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are planar two-dimensional (2D) X-rays derived from a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) dataset. DRRs allow the simulation of radiographs of all desired views and facilitate preoperative planning. However, orthopedic surgeons rely on C-arm fluoroscopic imaging during surgery to verify fracture reduction and implant placement. Pincushion distortion represents a technical limitation of fluoroscopic imaging, resulting in a greater distance between points at the periphery of the image compared to the center. This project, therefore, aimed to assess the image correlation between digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and fluoroscopic imaging (C-arm) using conventional radiographs (X-ray) as a control.

METHODS:

A 3D-printed cubic prototype and an anatomical humerus bone model were used. C-arm fluoroscopic radiographs and conventional X-ray images were taken in an anteroposterior (AP) view at 10-degree steps while rotating the objects from 0 to 90 degrees. CT scans were made and used to compute and export DRRs in AP view at 10-degree rotational steps from 0 to 90 degrees. The surface area (cm2) was measured and compared between the different modalities. For automated image analysis of the anatomical humerus model, matching (%) between modalities was calculated using the structural similarity index (SSIM).

RESULTS:

The overall regression was statistically significant in all models, with an R2 >0.99 when comparing all three imaging modalities of the prototype. Surface correlation in the anatomical humerus model was R2 0.99 between X-ray and C-arm and R2 0.95 between C-arm and X-ray to DRRs, respectively. The SSIM was highest for comparing DRR and C-arm images (0.84±0.01%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The study indicates a strong agreement between digitally reconstructed radiographs and X-ray/C-arm images. DRRs, therefore, represent a valuable tool for research and clinical application.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article