Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tranexamic Acid for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Hurley, Eoghan T; Rodriguez, Kaitlyn; Karavan, Mark P; Levin, Jay M; Helmkamp, Joshua; Anakwenze, Oke; Alaia, Michael J; Klifto, Christopher S.
Afiliação
  • Hurley ET; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Rodriguez K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Karavan MP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Levin JM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Helmkamp J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Anakwenze O; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Alaia MJ; NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
  • Klifto CS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Sports Med ; : 3635465231216336, 2024 Feb 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343386
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, these studies have shown mixed results, with some showing improved intraoperative visualization, subsequent operative times, and pain levels, and others finding no difference.

PURPOSE:

To perform a systematic review of the RCTs in the literature to evaluate the use of TXA on ARCR. STUDY

DESIGN:

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS:

Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a third author resolving any discrepancies. RCTs comparing TXA with a control in ARCR were included. Visualization, postoperative pain, operative time, pump pressures, and shoulder swelling were evaluated. A P value < .05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS:

Six RCTs with 450 patients were included in this review. Overall, 5 studies evaluated intraoperative visualization, with 3 studies finding a significant difference in favor of TXA. With TXA, patients had a lower mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of 3.3, and with the control, patients had a mean VAS score of 4.1, which was statistically significant (P = .001). With TXA, the mean weighted operation time was 79.3 minutes, and with the control, the mean operation time was 88.8 minutes, which was statistically significant (P = .001). No study found any difference in intraoperative pump pressures or swelling.

CONCLUSION:

TXA improved visualization, operative time, and subsequent postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing ARCR.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article