Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing how informal caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis access and use a curated intervention website: Analysis from an RCT.
Packer, Tanya; Austin, Nichole; Lehman, Michelle; Douglas, Sara L; Plow, Matthew.
Afiliação
  • Packer T; Schools of Health Administration and Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Austin N; School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Lehman M; Schools of Health Administration and Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Douglas SL; Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Plow M; Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241228403, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343587
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Healthcare consumers and providers are increasingly turning to digital solutions, such as curated websites. Knowing who accesses/benefits from these may improve design and development. This study investigated website usage of informal caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis and shifts in outcome plausibly associated with usage.

Methods:

Secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial of 148 caregivers compared effectiveness of a website + tele-coaching to a website only intervention for caregivers. Groupwise differences in means/proportions were tested using t-tests and chi-square. Modified Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator and ordinal logistic regression tested the relationship between group and likelihood of website log-in. Ordinal logistic regression models examined whether caregiver characteristics were associated with website use. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) with an autoregressive correlation structure modeled the relationship between website usage and outcomes.

Results:

Females were more likely to access the website than males (60% vs. 43%; p = 0.05). Though not statistically significant, a possible association (POR .85, 95% CI .69, 1.03) between caregiver burden and website access emerged; caregivers experiencing highest levels of burden appeared less likely to engage. Usage patterns differed by treatment arm the website-only group accessed the Caring for yourself topic significantly more (61.67% vs. 38.33% p = .04) with similar, but insignificant, trends for other topics.

Conclusions:

Clinicians can be confident referring females with moderate levels of burden to website-based interventions. By contrast, male caregivers and those experiencing high levels of burden may be less likely to access these resources, pointing to the need for alternative interventions. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT0466208.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article