Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy following preoperative chemotherapy for highly advanced gastric cancer.
Tanaka, Tsuyoshi; Suda, Koichi; Shibasaki, Susumu; Serizawa, Akiko; Akimoto, Shingo; Nakauchi, Masaya; Matsuoka, Hiroshi; Inaba, Kazuki; Uyama, Ichiro.
Afiliação
  • Tanaka T; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Suda K; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. ko-suda@nifty.com.
  • Shibasaki S; Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan. ko-suda@nifty.com.
  • Serizawa A; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Akimoto S; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Nakauchi M; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Matsuoka H; Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
  • Inaba K; Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
  • Uyama I; Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 74, 2024 Feb 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360577
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy in patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy for highly advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS:

Preoperative chemotherapy was indicated for patients with advanced large tumors (≥ cT3 and ≥ 5 cm) and/or bulky node metastasis (≥ 3 cm × 1 or ≥ 1.5 cm × 2). Between January 2009 and March 2022, 150 patients underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy with R0 resection, including conversion surgery (robotic, 62; laparoscopic, 88). The outcomes of these patients were retrospectively examined.

RESULTS:

Among them, 41 and 47 patients had stage IV disease and underwent splenectomy, respectively. Regarding operative outcomes, operative time was 475 min, blood loss was 72 g, morbidity (grade ≥ 3a) rate was 12%, local complication rate was 10.7%, and postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (Interquartile range 11-18 days). Fifty patients (33.3%) achieved grade ≥ 2 histological responses. Regarding resection types, total/proximal gastrectomy plus splenectomy (29.8%) was associated with significantly higher morbidity than other types (distal gastrectomy, 3.2%; total/proximal gastrectomy, 4.9%; P < 0.001). Specifically, among splenectomy cases, the rate of postoperative complications associated with the laparoscopic approach was significantly higher than that associated with the robotic approach (40.0% vs. 0%, P = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, splenectomy was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications [odds ratio, 8.574; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.584-28.443; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS:

Minimally invasive gastrectomy following preoperative chemotherapy was feasible and safe for patients with highly advanced gastric cancer. Robotic gastrectomy may improve surgical safety, particularly in the case of total/proximal gastrectomy combined with splenectomy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article