Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Proclarix in the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer.
Kaufmann, Basil; Fischer, Sharon; Athanasiou, Alcibiade; Lautenbach, Noémie; Wittig, Anja; Bieri, Uwe; Schmid, Florian A; von Stauffenberg, Franz; Scherer, Thomas; Eberli, Daniel; Gorin, Michael A; Schiess, Ralph; Poyet, Cédric.
Afiliação
  • Kaufmann B; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Fischer S; Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA.
  • Athanasiou A; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Lautenbach N; Proteomedix AG Zurich Switzerland.
  • Wittig A; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Bieri U; Proteomedix AG Zurich Switzerland.
  • Schmid FA; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • von Stauffenberg F; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Scherer T; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Eberli D; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Gorin MA; Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Schiess R; Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA.
  • Poyet C; Proteomedix AG Zurich Switzerland.
BJUI Compass ; 5(2): 297-303, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38371198
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been widely adopted in the diagnostic work-up for suspicious prostate cancer (PCa) and is recommended in most current guidelines. However, mpMRI lesions are often indeterminate and/or turn out to be false-positive on prostate biopsy. The aim of this work was to evaluate Proclarix, a biomarker test for the detection of relevant PCa, regarding its diagnostic value in all men before biopsy and in men with indeterminate lesions on mpMRI (PI-RADS 3) during work-up for PCa. Materials and

Methods:

Men undergoing mpMRI-targeted and systematic biopsy of the prostate were prospectively enrolled. The Proclarix test was evaluated for the detection accuracy of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as Grade Group ≥ 2 and its association to mpMRI results. Further, Proclarix's performance was also tested when adapted to prostate volume (Proclarix density) and performance compared to PSA density (PSAD).

Results:

A total of 150 men with a median age of 65 years and median PSA of 5.8 ng/mL were included in this study. CsPCa was diagnosed in 65 (43%) men. Proclarix was significantly associated with csPCa and higher PI-RADS score (p < 0.001). At the pre-defined cut-off of 10%, Proclarix's sensitivity for csPCa was 94%, specificity 19%, negative predictive value 80% and positive predictive value 47%. Proclarix density showed the highest AUC for the detection of csPCa of 0.77 (95%CI 0.69-0.85) compared to PSA, PSAD and Proclarix alone. Proclarix was able to identify all six csPCa in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions (n = 28), whereas PSAD missed two out of six. At optimized cut-offs, Proclarix density outperformed PSAD by potentially avoiding 41% of unnecessary biopsies.

Conclusion:

Proclarix demonstrates high sensitivity in detecting csPCa but may still result in unnecessary biopsies. However, Proclarix density was able to outperform PSAD and Proclarix and was found to be useful in men with PI-RADS 3 findings by safely avoiding unnecessary biopsies without missing csPCa.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article