Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Relationship between Pre-Anesthetic Analgesia and Nociception (ANI) and Propofol Injection Pain among Patients Receiving Remifentanil: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.
Lee, Cheolhyeong; Lee, Cheol; Lim, Junsung; Park, Jeongki; Jung, Jaehak; Lee, Hayoung; Lee, Myeongjong.
Afiliação
  • Lee C; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee C; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Park J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee H; Department of Nursing, Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee M; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical School, 82 Gugwondae-ro, Chungju 27376, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(2)2024 Feb 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38399560
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

The analgesia/nociception index (ANI) potentially monitors nociceptive status during anesthesia, but its link to preoperative pain sensitivity is unclear. We investigated the relationship between pre-anesthetic ANI scores and propofol injection pain (PIP) in patients receiving remifentanil. Materials and

Methods:

This study included 124 male patients aged 19-60 undergoing general anesthesia (ASA class I or II). Patients were randomized to group R (n = 62, remifentanil 4 ng/mL) or group C (n = 62, saline). The primary outcome was the association between PIP and ANI. Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of PIP or rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement (RIWM) and their association with ANI.

Results:

PIP and RIWM incidence and severity were lower in group R than in group C. A weak negative correlation between PIP and ANI at pre-induction (rpb = -0.21, p = 0.02, rpb = -0.37, p < 0.01) and a moderate negative correlation during propofol injection (rpb = -0.48, p = 0.02) were observed. A significant negative correlation was found between RIWM and ANI during rocuronium injection (τb = -0.61, p < 0.01). AUC, cut-off value, specificity, and sensitivity in ANI at pre-induction for predicting PIP were 0.67 (p = 0.02), 59, 76%, and 55%, respectively. AUC, cut-off value, specificity, and sensitivity in ANI during propofol injection for PIP were 0.77 (p < 0.01), 65, 81%, and 67%, respectively.

Conclusions:

ANI scores demonstrated significant differences between groups, suggesting potential predictive value for PIP despite the low pre-induction AUC value. This study highlights the potential of using ANI scores to predict and manage PIP in patients receiving remifentanil.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Analgesia Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Analgesia Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article