Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of capsular tension ring on the refractive outcomes of patients with extreme high axial myopia after phacoemulsification.
Zhao, Hui-Ying; Zhang, Jing-Shang; Li, Meng; Chen, Dong-Jun; Wan, Xiu-Hua.
Afiliação
  • Zhao HY; Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang JS; Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China.
  • Li M; Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China.
  • Chen DJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wan XH; Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China. wanxh@ccmu.edu.cn.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 142, 2024 Feb 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402171
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation following cataract surgery on the refractive outcomes of patients with extreme high axial myopia.

METHODS:

Sixty eyes (with an axial length of ≥26 mm) were retrospectively reviewed and classified into two groups CTR group (n = 30), which underwent CTR implantation following phacoemulsification, and control group (n = 30), which did not undergo CTR implantation. Intraocular lens (IOL) calculation was performed using Barrett Universal II (UII), Haigis, and SRK/T formulas. The refractive prediction error (PE) was calculated by subtracting the postoperative refraction from predicted refraction. The mean PE (MPE), mean absolute error (MAE), and percentages of eyes that had a PE of ±0.25, ±0.50, ±1.00, or ±2.00 diopters (D) were calculated and compared.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were observed in PE between the two groups. The Barrett UII formula revealed a lower AE in the CTR group than in the control group (p = 0.015) and a lower AE than the other two formulas (p = 0.0000) in both groups. The Barrett UII formula achieved the highest percentage of eyes with a PE of ±0.25 D (66.67%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The refractive outcomes were more accurate in eyes with CTR implantation than in those with routine phacoemulsification based on the Barrett UII formula. The Barrett UII formula was recommended as the appropriate formula when planning CTR implantation in high myopia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Facoemulsificação / Lentes Intraoculares / Miopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Facoemulsificação / Lentes Intraoculares / Miopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article