Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detecting tail biters by monitoring pig screams in weaning pigs.
Heseker, Philipp; Bergmann, Tjard; Scheumann, Marina; Traulsen, Imke; Kemper, Nicole; Probst, Jeanette.
Afiliação
  • Heseker P; Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behavior (ITTN), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. philipp.heseker@tiho-hannover.de.
  • Bergmann T; Department of Animal Sciences, Livestock Systems, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany. philipp.heseker@tiho-hannover.de.
  • Scheumann M; Institute for Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
  • Traulsen I; Institute for Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
  • Kemper N; Department of Animal Sciences, Livestock Systems, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Probst J; Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4523, 2024 02 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402339
ABSTRACT
Early identification of tail biting and intervention are necessary to reduce tail lesions and their impact on animal health and welfare. Removal of biters has become an effective intervention strategy, but finding them can be difficult and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to investigate whether tail biting and, in particular, individual biters could be identified by detecting pig screams in audio recordings. The study included 288 undocked weaner pigs housed in six pens in two batches. Once a tail biter (n = 7) was identified by visual inspection in the stable and removed by the farm staff, the previous days of video and audio recordings were analyzed for pig screams (sudden increase in loudness with frequencies above 1 kHz) and tail biting events until no biting before the removal was observed anymore. In total, 2893 screams were detected in four pens where tail biting occurred. Of these screams, 52.9% were caused by tail biting in the observed pen, 25.6% originated from other pens, 8.8% were not assignable, and 12.7% occurred due to other reasons. In case of a tail biting event, screams were assigned individually to biter and victim pigs. Based on the audio analysis, biters were identified between one and nine days prior to their removal from the pen after visual inspection. Screams were detected earlier than the increase in hanging tails and could therefore be favored as an early warning indicator. Analyzing animal vocalization has potential for monitoring and early detection of tail biting events. In combination with individual marks and automatic analysis algorithms, biters could be identified and tail biting efficiently reduced. In this way, biters can be removed earlier to increase animal health and welfare.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Mordeduras e Picadas Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Mordeduras e Picadas Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article