Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparisons of 3D printed materials for biomedical imaging applications.
Gabalski, Mitchell A; Smith, Kylie R; Hix, Jeremy; Zinn, Kurt R.
Afiliação
  • Gabalski MA; Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Smith KR; Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Hix J; Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Zinn KR; Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Sci Technol Adv Mater ; 24(1): 2273803, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415266
ABSTRACT
In biomedical imaging, it is desirable that custom-made accessories for restraint, anesthesia, and monitoring can be easily cleaned and not interfere with the imaging quality or analyses. With the rise of 3D printing as a form of rapid prototyping or manufacturing for imaging tools and accessories, it is important to understand which printable materials are durable and not likely to interfere with imaging applications. Here, 15 3D printable materials were evaluated for radiodensity, optical properties, simulated wear, and capacity for repeated cleaning and disinfection. Materials that were durable, easily cleaned, and not expected to interfere with CT, PET, or optical imaging applications were identified.
A guide for selecting 3D printed materials for custom research tools through characterization of their merits and limitations in biomedical imaging.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article