Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The combined application of hand hygiene and non-sterile gloves by nurses in a tertiary hospital: a multi methods study.
Dekker, Mireille; van Mansfeld, Rosa; Borgert, Marjon; Maaskant, Jolanda; Paulus, Frederique; Seller, Annamarike; Jongerden, Irene P.
Afiliação
  • Dekker M; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.vanoijen@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • van Mansfeld R; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Borgert M; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Intensive Care, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Maaskant J; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Paulus F; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Intensive Care, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Seller A; Department of Human Resources, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jongerden IP; Amsterdam Research Center for Health Economics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 23, 2024 Feb 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419094
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The application of hand hygiene (HH) and the use of non-sterile gloves (NSG) in daily care is highly intertwined. We aimed (1) to assess the combined application of HH and NSG among nurses and (2) to explore determinants that influence their ability to combine both measures in their care.

METHODS:

In a multi-methods study, we combined direct observations of care episodes with semi-structured interviews with nurses in two affiliated university hospitals. Topics were based on Flottorp's checklist of determinants of practice.

RESULTS:

In total, we observed 205 care episodes and interviewed 10 nurses. Observations revealed that the combination of NSG and HH was correctly applied in 19% of care episodes in which a single procedure was executed, and in 2% of care episodes in which multiple procedures were performed. From the interviews, we found determinants that influenced compliance, covered mainly by three out of seven of Flottorp's checklist domains. Nurses indicated that their knowledge of protocols was limited to HH and protocols were hardly ever actively consulted; visual reminders within their workplace were used as sources of information. Nurses' behavior was primarily influenced by their ability to operationalize this information and their ability to integrate both infection prevention measures into their care. The intention to apply and combine HH and NSG use was influenced by their risk assessment of cross-contamination, by the urge to self-protect and gut feeling. The feasibility to execute HH and NSG protocols is influenced by the urgency and the complexity of the care episode.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combined correct application with HH and NSG measures by nurses is low. Nurses are instructed in a fragmented way while in the day to day care HH and NSG use are highly intertwined. Operationalization and simplification of infection prevention protocols, in which instructions on both infection prevention measures are fused, should be considered. Strategies to improve practice should consider the power of habit and nurses urge to self-protect.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Higiene das Mãos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Higiene das Mãos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article