Efficacy comparison between iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous three-dimensional printing guide template and conventional fluoroscopy. / æ”¹è‰¯ç»çš®ä¸‰ç»´æ‰“å°å¯¼æ¿ä¸Žä¼ ç»Ÿé€è§†è¾ åŠ©éª¶é«‚èžºé’‰å›ºå®šéª¨ç›†åŽçŽ¯éª¨æŠ˜çš„ç–—æ•ˆæ¯”è¾ƒ.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone-attached guide plate assisted cannulated screw fixation of pelvic fracture is reliable, but extensive soft tissue dissection is still required when installing the guide plate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of posterior pelvic ring fracture fixation with iliosacral screw insertion between the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template and conventional fluoroscopy. METHODS: From May, 2019 and September 2021, 28 patients sustained posterior pelvic ring fractures were randomized into 2 groups A guide template group, in which the iliosacral screw was inserted for fixation of the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template, and a fluoroscopy group, in which the iliosacral screw was inserted under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy. The operation time, fluoroscopic frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and incision length were recorded for each screw insertion. Fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta criteria. The screw position was evaluated according to the modified Gras classification, and the functional outcome was evaluated according to Majeed score. The parameters of both groups were compared, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: All the 28 patients were followed up for 12-24 months. Of them, 15 iliosacral screws were inserted in 14 patients in the guide template group, and 14 iliosacral screws were inserted in 14 patients in the fluoroscopy group. The operation time, fluoroscopic frequency, screw deviation, incision length, and blood loss in the guide template group were 20-30(25.8±2.8) min, 9-15(12.2±1.9), 2-4(2.6±0.7) mm, 4-5(4.6±0.5) cm, and 5-10 (7.8±1.7) mL, respectively, whereas those in the fluoroscopy group were 30-60(48.1±7.5) min, 40-96(64.7±16.3), 3-6(4.2±0.9) mm, 0.8-1.2(1.0±0.1) cm, and 2-5(3.1±1.3) mL, respectively, and there were statistical significance (all P<0.001). Fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta criteria, and all the patients reached excellence and good (P=0.584) in the 2 groups. According to modified Gras classification, there were 12 Grade I screws, 3 Grade II screws, and 0 Grade III screws in the guide template group, and 10 Grade I screws, 3 Grade II screws, and 1 Grade III screw in the fluoroscopy group, with no statistical significance (P=0.334). The functional outcome was evaluated according to Majeed score at the last follow-up, without significant difference between the guide template group and the fluoroscopy group (P=0.908). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional fluoroscopy, it would cost less operation time, less fluoroscopic frequency and increase more accurate screw insertion to fixate the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template.