Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Karimi, Zahra; Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi; Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah.
Afiliação
  • Karimi Z; M.Sc. of Epidemiology, Student Research Committee, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
  • Raeisi Shahraki H; Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
  • Mohammadian-Hafshejani A; Assistant Professor of Epidemiology, Modeling in Health Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran. Electronic address: amohamadii1361@gmail.com.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 162(10): e43-e51, 2024 05 31.
Article em En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433073
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Anemia is a common condition in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anemia in these patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding their potential effects on blood pressure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the relationship between ESAs and changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.

METHOD:

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on clinical trial studies published in various databases, including Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, between 1980 and the end of 2022. We evaluated the quality of articles using the Jadad scale checklist and analyzed the data using Stata 15 software.

RESULTS:

Our meta-analysis included 34 clinical trial studies. The results showed a significant increase in both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after the consumption of ESAs compared to before consumption. The mean difference in SBP was 4.84mmHg (95% CI 2.74-6.94; p-value<0.001) and in DBP was 4.69mmHg (95% CI 2.67-6.71; p-value<0.001). No publication bias was observed. Our meta-regression analysis showed that sample size, quality assessment score, and geographical location of the study were significant factors related to observed heterogenicity in to mean difference of SBP (p-value≤0.20). For DBP, the sample size, quality assessment score and follow-up duration were significant variables (p-value≤0.20).

CONCLUSION:

Based on the findings of our study, it appears that receiving ESAs is associated with a significant increase in both SBP and DBP in hemodialysis patients, with an increase of about 5mmHg.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão Sanguínea / Diálise Renal / Hematínicos / Anemia / Falência Renal Crônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão Sanguínea / Diálise Renal / Hematínicos / Anemia / Falência Renal Crônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article