Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subsidized gestational diabetes mellitus screening and management program in rural China: a pragmatic multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Xu, Tingting; Xia, Qing; Lai, Xiaozhen; He, Kun; Fan, Dazhi; Ma, Liangkun; Fang, Hai.
Afiliação
  • Xu T; Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
  • Xia Q; School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100083, China.
  • Lai X; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • He K; School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100083, China.
  • Fan D; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Ma L; National Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
  • Fang H; Foshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Affiliated Women and Children Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong, 528000, China.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 98, 2024 Mar 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443958
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major challenge, particularly in rural areas of China where control rates are suboptimal. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a GDM subsidy program in promoting GDM screening and management in these underserved regions.

METHODS:

This multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in obstetric clinics of six rural hospitals located in three provinces in China. Eligible participants were pregnant women in 24-28 weeks' gestation, without overt diabetes, with a singleton pregnancy, access to a telephone, and provided informed consent. Participants were randomly assigned in a 11 ratio to either the intervention or control groups using an internet-based, computer-generated randomization system. The intervention group received subsidized care for GDM, which included screening, blood glucose retesting, and lifestyle management, with financial assistance provided to health care providers. In contrast, the control group received usual care. The primary outcomes of this study were the combined maternal and neonatal complications associated with GDM, as defined by the occurrence of at least one pre-defined complication in either the mother or newborn. The secondary outcomes included the GDM screening rate, rates of glucose retesting for pregnant women diagnosed with GDM, dietary patterns, physical activity levels, gestational weight gain, and antenatal visit frequency for exploratory purposes. Primary and secondary outcomes were obtained for all participants with and without GDM. Binary outcomes were analyzed by the generalized linear model with a link of logistic, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Count outcomes were analyzed by Poisson regression, and incidence rate ratios with 95% CIs were reported.

RESULTS:

A total of 3294 pregnant women were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 1649) or the control group (n = 1645) between 15 September 2018 and 30 September 2019. The proportion of pregnant women in the intervention group who suffered from combined maternal and/or neonatal complications was lower than in the control group with adjusted OR = 0.86 (0.80 to 0.94, P = 0.001), and a more significant difference was observed in the GDM subgroup (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95, P = 0.025). No predefined safety or adverse events of ketosis or ketoacidosis associated with GDM management were detected in this study. Both the intervention and control groups had high GDM screening rates (intervention 97.2% [1602/1649]; control 94.5% [1555/1645], P < 0.001). Moreover, The intervention group showed a healthier lifestyle, with lower energy intake and more walking minutes (P values < 0.05), and more frequent blood glucose testing (1.5 vs. 0.4 visits; P = 0.001) compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION:

In rural China, a GDM care program that provided incentives for both pregnant women and healthcare providers resulted in improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Public health subsidy programs in China should consider incorporating GDM screening and management to further enhance reproductive health. TRIAL REGISTRATION China Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR1800017488. https//www.chictr.org.cn/.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article