Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-Energy Low-Kiloelectron Volt versus Single-Energy Low-Kilovolt Images for Endoleak Detection at CT Angiography of the Aorta.
Landsmann, Anna; Sartoretti, Thomas; Mergen, Victor; Jungblut, Lisa; Eberhard, Matthias; Kobe, Adrian; Alkadhi, Hatem; Euler, André.
Afiliação
  • Landsmann A; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Sartoretti T; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Mergen V; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Jungblut L; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Eberhard M; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Kobe A; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Alkadhi H; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
  • Euler A; From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (A.L., T.S., V.M., L.J., M.E., A.K., H.A., A.E.); Department of Radiology, Spital Interlaken, Spitäler fmi AG, Unterseen, Switzerland (M.E.); an
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 6(2): e230217, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451189
ABSTRACT
Purpose To compare image quality, diagnostic performance, and conspicuity between single-energy and multi-energy images for endoleak detection at CT angiography (CTA) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Materials and Methods In this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial, individuals undergoing CTA after EVAR between August 2020 and May 2022 were allocated to imaging using either low-kilovolt single-energy images (SEI; 80 kV, group A) or low-kiloelectron volt virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at 40 and 50 keV from multi-energy CT (80/Sn150 kV, group B). Scan protocols were dose matched (volume CT dose index mean, 4.5 mGy ± 1.8 [SD] vs 4.7 mGy ± 1.3, P = .41). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured. Two expert radiologists established the reference standard for the presence of endoleaks. Detection and conspicuity of endoleaks and subjective image quality were assessed by two different blinded radiologists. Interreader agreement was calculated. Nonparametric statistical tests were used. Results A total of 125 participants (mean age, 76 years ± 8; 103 men) were allocated to groups A (n = 64) and B (n = 61). CNR was significantly lower for 40-keV VMI (mean, 19.1; P = .048) and 50-keV VMI (mean, 16.8; P < .001) as compared with SEI (mean, 22.2). In total, 45 endoleaks were present (A 23 vs B 22). Sensitivity for endoleak detection was higher for SEI (82.6%, 19 of 23; P = .88) and 50-keV VMI (81.8%, 18 of 22; P = .90) as compared with 40-keV VMI (77.3%, 17 of 22). Specificity was comparable among groups (SEI 92.7%, 38 of 41; both VMI energies 92.3%, 35 of 38; P = .99), with an interreader agreement of 1. Conspicuity of endoleaks was comparable between SEI (median, 2.99) and VMI (both energies median, 2.87; P = .04). Overall subjective image quality was rated significantly higher for SEI (median, 4 [IQR, 4-4) as compared with 40 and 50 keV (both energies median, 4 [IQR, 3-4]; P < .001). Conclusion SEI demonstrated higher image quality and comparable diagnostic accuracy as compared with 50-keV VMI for endoleak detection at CTA after EVAR. Keywords Aneurysms, CT, CT Angiography, Vascular, Aorta, Technology Assessment, Multidetector CT, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Endoleaks, Perigraft Leak Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoleak / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoleak / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article