Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heart rate score in remote monitoring: An additional tool for predicting outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Barradas, Maria Inês; Coutinho Dos Santos, Inês; Duarte, Fabiana; Viveiros Monteiro, André; Tavares, Anabela; Martins, Dinis.
Afiliação
  • Barradas MI; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
  • Coutinho Dos Santos I; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
  • Duarte F; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
  • Viveiros Monteiro A; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
  • Tavares A; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
  • Martins D; Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel, Portugal.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 47(4): 490-495, 2024 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462714
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Heart rate score (HRS) ≥ 70% has been associated with arrhythmic events and mortality but these studies were not specific for heart failure (HF) patients. We hypothesized that HRS ≥ 70% obtained from remote monitoring (RM) is associated with HF hospitalizations and arrhythmic events in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS:

HRS was calculated from RM in patients with HFrEF and ICD or CRT-D. Two groups were defined HRS ≥ 70% (G1, n = 55) and HRS < 70% (G2, n = 48)

RESULTS:

A total of 103 patients were included (64.4 ± 13.04 years, 69.9% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 33.62 ± 11.97% and FUP 61.7 ± 38.87 months). The device was CRT-D in 59.2% and ICD in 40.8% and the majority (90.3%) had the device implanted in primary prevention. G1 patients were more frequently male (p = .017) and had more coronary disease (p = .035). HRS ≥70% was an independent predictor for unplanned HF hospitalizations (OR 1.905 (95% CI 1.328-3.649), p < .001)). The indication for device implantation (primary vs. secondary prevention), type of device, NYHA class, age, gender and LVEF were not independent predictors of the outcome. VF (4.9 ± 20.0 G1 vs. 1.1 ± 5.47 G2, p = .046) and VT episodes were more prevalent in G1 (3.1 ± 8.93 G1 vs. 0.3 ± 1.59 G2, p = .026), as well as appropriate device shocks (4.3 ± 12.06 G1 vs. 0.3 ± 1.49 G2, p = .023). There was no difference in inappropriate shocks or mortality outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSION:

HRS ≥70% obtained from RM was an independent predictor of HF hospitalizations and was associated with arrhythmic events with VT and VF episodes and appropriate device shocks in HFrEF patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Insuficiência Cardíaca Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Insuficiência Cardíaca Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article