Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sight threatening diabetic retinopathy in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2.
Huemer, Josef; Heeren, Tjebo Fc; Olvera-Barrios, Abraham; Faes, Livia; Casella, Antonio M B; Hughes, Edward; Tufail, Adnan; Egan, Catherine.
Afiliação
  • Huemer J; Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, 62 City Rd., EC1V 2PD, London, UK.
  • Heeren TF; Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
  • Olvera-Barrios A; Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, 62 City Rd., EC1V 2PD, London, UK.
  • Faes L; University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
  • Casella AMB; Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, 62 City Rd., EC1V 2PD, London, UK.
  • Hughes E; University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
  • Tufail A; Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, 62 City Rd., EC1V 2PD, London, UK.
  • Egan C; Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Center, Londrina State University, Paraná, Brazil.
Int J Retina Vitreous ; 10(1): 28, 2024 Mar 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475930
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although diabetes is highly prevalent in patients with MacTel, progression to severe non-proliferative (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is rarely reported. We report multimodal imaging features of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in eyes with macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel).

METHODS:

Retrospective case series of seven participants of the MacTel Study at the Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust study site and one patient from the Institute of Retina and Vitreous of Londrina, Brazil. Sight threatening diabetic retinopathy was defined as severe NPDR, PDR or diabetic macular edema.

RESULTS:

We report imaging features of 16 eyes of eight patients (7/8, 87.5% female) with diagnoses of MacTel and type 2 diabetes mellitus with STDR. Mean (SD) age was 56 (8.3) years. Patients were followed-up for a mean time of 9.1 (4.7) years. A total of 10/16 (62.5%) eyes showed PDR and 2/16 (12.5%) eyes presented a macular epiretinal neovascularization.

CONCLUSIONS:

People with diabetes mellitus and MacTel may not be protected from STDR as previously reported. Although the two diseases rarely co-exist, regular monitoring for diabetic retinopathy progression is recommended according to baseline retinopathy severity grades in line with established international guidelines. The presence of MacTel may not modify extended screening intervals, but there is no current evidence. The limited case series in the literature support treatment for complications and should follow the standard of care for either condition. Due to dual pathology, reactivation may be difficult to diagnose on standard imaging and multimodal imaging is recommended.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article